Microsoft vs Yahoo - Microsoft will win
What a clever game Steve Ballmer is playing with Yahoo! Walking away from his bid for Yahoo was the best move he could have made. In the process, Ballmer is revealing himself a student of Sun Tzu's Bing Fa. My personal prediction is Microsoft will win in its bid, and probably for not much more than the bid he just ended. The reason is simple: Yahoo needs Microsoft more than Microsoft needs Yahoo.
Google is the dominant player in the online search game. Maybe not in every country. Yahoo is still very strong in China, while Google is not. But clearly Yahoo has a fight on its hands for dominance of online advertising. Note how Yahoo sought a white knight in the face of Microsoft's bid. Ironically, Yahoo approached its main competitor Google. Google, which was already warning it was going to fight a Microsoft-Yahoo tie-up on the grounds it would be uncompetitive, offered to share its search technology with Yahoo.
End result:
• Google became stronger by showing its dominance in the search game. It can't make a move on Yahoo because that will never get past the competition authorities. But by sharing its search technology it already smacks of a merger by stealth.
• Yahoo revealed its weakness by scampering for a saviour. Now that Microsoft launched a bid, the company is in play. Everytime the stockprice falls, people will say Microsoft will make another bid for it. It won't end until its taken over.
• Microsoft certainly didn't want to see a Yahoo-Google tie-up, and it was a good enough pretext for Ballmer to walk away from it. But come on, is he really now no longer interested in Yahoo? Microsoft is still the one with multi-billion dollar cashflows. Having shown his hand, Ballmer is committed to winning the game, or forever be reflecting on 'the one that got away'.
But don't forget shareholders. At the end of the day, it's their call. And right now, I would rather be Steve Ballmer than Jerry Yang. Yang has to explain to Yahoo shareholders why he said no to Microsoft's offer, which valued the company at substantially more than the market did.
My call: Microsoft will wait for a while to see what happens next. Yahoo's stockprice will fall further. Yahoo only has two choices: play ball with the arch-competitor Google, or Microsoft. Ballmer will then make another bid. Shareholders, who are unhappy with Yang for not saying yes to the now-defunct first bid, will be glad to accept.
Google may argue against a merger on competitiveness grounds. It knows Microsoft is still on the nose in many countries over its dominance in software. It will want to play on the fears that Microsoft will do to online search what it did to operating systems and office software. But then again, Google is already the Microsoft of the online search game. Regulators may take the other view and think that a little competition to Google will do advertisers more good than harm. Any advertiser, who has seen search terms become more and more expensive on a per-click basis, will testify to that.
But Microsoft will win it. Ballmer reminds me of Rupert Murdoch. Back in 2000, the News Corp chief wanted to get control of the US satellite television network Direct-TV. That was then owned by Hughes Electronics, owned by General Motors. News Corp lost a hostile takeover battle to Echostar. But Echostar's deal didn't go through. In stepped Rupert Murdoch again. He had the last laugh afterall.
The same will happen for Microsoft.
It's funny how these things turn out.
Mark Laudi, who predicts another Microsoft bid will come before the end of 2008.
To comment on this blog, go to the Investor Central blog.
Visit the brand new Investor Central website! for FREE SMS alerts to news about stocks in your watchlist
Google is the dominant player in the online search game. Maybe not in every country. Yahoo is still very strong in China, while Google is not. But clearly Yahoo has a fight on its hands for dominance of online advertising. Note how Yahoo sought a white knight in the face of Microsoft's bid. Ironically, Yahoo approached its main competitor Google. Google, which was already warning it was going to fight a Microsoft-Yahoo tie-up on the grounds it would be uncompetitive, offered to share its search technology with Yahoo.
End result:
• Google became stronger by showing its dominance in the search game. It can't make a move on Yahoo because that will never get past the competition authorities. But by sharing its search technology it already smacks of a merger by stealth.
• Yahoo revealed its weakness by scampering for a saviour. Now that Microsoft launched a bid, the company is in play. Everytime the stockprice falls, people will say Microsoft will make another bid for it. It won't end until its taken over.
• Microsoft certainly didn't want to see a Yahoo-Google tie-up, and it was a good enough pretext for Ballmer to walk away from it. But come on, is he really now no longer interested in Yahoo? Microsoft is still the one with multi-billion dollar cashflows. Having shown his hand, Ballmer is committed to winning the game, or forever be reflecting on 'the one that got away'.
But don't forget shareholders. At the end of the day, it's their call. And right now, I would rather be Steve Ballmer than Jerry Yang. Yang has to explain to Yahoo shareholders why he said no to Microsoft's offer, which valued the company at substantially more than the market did.
My call: Microsoft will wait for a while to see what happens next. Yahoo's stockprice will fall further. Yahoo only has two choices: play ball with the arch-competitor Google, or Microsoft. Ballmer will then make another bid. Shareholders, who are unhappy with Yang for not saying yes to the now-defunct first bid, will be glad to accept.
Google may argue against a merger on competitiveness grounds. It knows Microsoft is still on the nose in many countries over its dominance in software. It will want to play on the fears that Microsoft will do to online search what it did to operating systems and office software. But then again, Google is already the Microsoft of the online search game. Regulators may take the other view and think that a little competition to Google will do advertisers more good than harm. Any advertiser, who has seen search terms become more and more expensive on a per-click basis, will testify to that.
But Microsoft will win it. Ballmer reminds me of Rupert Murdoch. Back in 2000, the News Corp chief wanted to get control of the US satellite television network Direct-TV. That was then owned by Hughes Electronics, owned by General Motors. News Corp lost a hostile takeover battle to Echostar. But Echostar's deal didn't go through. In stepped Rupert Murdoch again. He had the last laugh afterall.
The same will happen for Microsoft.
It's funny how these things turn out.
Mark Laudi, who predicts another Microsoft bid will come before the end of 2008.
To comment on this blog, go to the Investor Central blog.
Visit the brand new Investor Central website! for FREE SMS alerts to news about stocks in your watchlist
Labels: Jerry Yang, Microsoft, Steve Ballmer, Yahoo
Passed through quality checks? --- not enough!!
Microsoft has recently recorded a pretax charge of $1.15 bln to extend its warranty coverage for its Xbox 360 gaming console from 1-yr to 3-yrs, after receiving 'unexpected' calls for repairs.
Today, Contel Corporation announced that it has won a multi-million dollar deal from Harmonix Systems to develop and produce 'Rock Band' game controller, modelled with a Fender Stratocaster electric guitar. This programme will then be made compatible with Xbox 360, which is undergoing a lot of repair works, and even Playstation3 for Holiday 2007.
Products like these usually goes to popular gaming devices like the Xbox 360. To have faulty components may cause the product to be unpopular.
The Xbox 360 was launched in November 2005, by which 11.6 mln consoles were being shipped around the world. According to The Wall Street Journal on 9 July 2007, Monday, 5.6 mln of the Xbox were sold by U.S retailers alone.
In the article, it also added that in previous three fiscal years, Microsoft saw operating losses, especially coming from the Xbox 360 division. It was reported by a user that “too much heat being generated by components”. Microsoft says it will be reducing its earnings per charge for the quarter by 7 to 8 cts.
These days, products, especially gadgets, gets smaller by the day. The smaller the components, the chances for it to overheat tend to be higher. So by having a normal quality check (QC) is not enough anymore!
My reasons:
First, it is inconvenient for both the supplier and consumer. If it is faulty, the user has to send it for checks or repairation. The supplier will have to cover costs as mentioned in the warranty. If it's just a handful of people coming back for checks is normal--- technology is bound to have some fault in them. But if those number gets out of hand, in the case of Microsoft's Xbox 360, then something has yet to be said about its components.
Second, it could well be dangerous! Overheating, may lead to fire and the age demographics for Xbox 360 stretches across to the younger generation, who may not necessarily know what to do in cases of emergency. Take for example the Osim's uZap MINI recall because it was a potential fire hazard. At the end of the day, safety comes first.
Recall or repair works under warranty means more money had to be spent to cover these expenses.
In money sense, all these things could have been prevented if there had been more thorough or extensive checks for the products. Products like the uZap MINI and Xbox 360 has been known to overheat, and so possibly is the case for other gadgets as well. To avoid all these, as the saying goes, 'prepare your umbrella before it starts raining'; in other words, why not invest in a bit more doing extensive checks like overheating and all, pay a bit extra now, to save the potential bigger spending afterwards doing repairs and recalls. This would not look good on the product profile.
What do you think?
Nurwidya Abdul
ArchivesToday, Contel Corporation announced that it has won a multi-million dollar deal from Harmonix Systems to develop and produce 'Rock Band' game controller, modelled with a Fender Stratocaster electric guitar. This programme will then be made compatible with Xbox 360, which is undergoing a lot of repair works, and even Playstation3 for Holiday 2007.
Products like these usually goes to popular gaming devices like the Xbox 360. To have faulty components may cause the product to be unpopular.
The Xbox 360 was launched in November 2005, by which 11.6 mln consoles were being shipped around the world. According to The Wall Street Journal on 9 July 2007, Monday, 5.6 mln of the Xbox were sold by U.S retailers alone.
In the article, it also added that in previous three fiscal years, Microsoft saw operating losses, especially coming from the Xbox 360 division. It was reported by a user that “too much heat being generated by components”. Microsoft says it will be reducing its earnings per charge for the quarter by 7 to 8 cts.
These days, products, especially gadgets, gets smaller by the day. The smaller the components, the chances for it to overheat tend to be higher. So by having a normal quality check (QC) is not enough anymore!
My reasons:
First, it is inconvenient for both the supplier and consumer. If it is faulty, the user has to send it for checks or repairation. The supplier will have to cover costs as mentioned in the warranty. If it's just a handful of people coming back for checks is normal--- technology is bound to have some fault in them. But if those number gets out of hand, in the case of Microsoft's Xbox 360, then something has yet to be said about its components.
Second, it could well be dangerous! Overheating, may lead to fire and the age demographics for Xbox 360 stretches across to the younger generation, who may not necessarily know what to do in cases of emergency. Take for example the Osim's uZap MINI recall because it was a potential fire hazard. At the end of the day, safety comes first.
Recall or repair works under warranty means more money had to be spent to cover these expenses.
In money sense, all these things could have been prevented if there had been more thorough or extensive checks for the products. Products like the uZap MINI and Xbox 360 has been known to overheat, and so possibly is the case for other gadgets as well. To avoid all these, as the saying goes, 'prepare your umbrella before it starts raining'; in other words, why not invest in a bit more doing extensive checks like overheating and all, pay a bit extra now, to save the potential bigger spending afterwards doing repairs and recalls. This would not look good on the product profile.
What do you think?
Nurwidya Abdul
Labels: fire hazard, Microsoft, Osim, overheating, QC, quality checks, uZap MINI, Xbox 360
January 2006 February 2006 March 2006 April 2006 May 2006 June 2006 July 2006 August 2006 September 2006 October 2006 November 2006 December 2006 January 2007 February 2007 March 2007 April 2007 May 2007 June 2007 July 2007 August 2007 September 2007 October 2007 November 2007 December 2007 January 2008 February 2008 March 2008 April 2008 May 2008 August 2008 September 2008 October 2008 November 2008 January 2009
