Singapore-KL Route: Open it up already
Singapore’s efforts to get access for Singapore Airlines to fly Australia-US routes seem quite churlish in light of the reticence to open up the Singapore-Kuala Lumpur route to more competition.
But things are finally happening on that front.
It's been two years since Malaysia and Singapore started entertaining the idea of revising their 34-year-old bilateral air service agreement.
This means the countries' national carriers – Malaysia Airlines and Singapore Airlines – would lose their duopoly.
Malaysia set up a committee last month to decide on the feasibility of such an agreement ahead of ASEAN's Open Sky Agreement, which states that airlines of member countries can operate unlimited flights between their capital cities by 2008.
While air agreements do not require the consent of national carriers, they are usually consulted before deals are sealed.
But if the national airlines have a lot of clout, their interests are sometimes put before the countries'.
Channel NewsAsia quoted Malaysian Transport Minister Chan Kong Choy as saying, “We believe the further liberalisation of aviation links actually benefits the two countries in tourism, trade and investment. Whether you like it or not, according to this ASEAN aviation roadmap, we are going to open up.”
So let's get down to business. Is this going to hurt SIA or not?
Personally, I think it is going to hurt MAS more than SIA because it will be difficult to turn around RM1.3 bln of losses reported last year without this profitable route.
Given the 30minute flight time and lack of service, paying S$425 for a round trip ticket is pretty extortionate.
It's no wonder AirAsia head Tony Fernandes wants a piece of the pie, and so does Tiger Airways.
This is the most expensive sector to fly in the world and together the airlines operate more than 200 flights a week!
SIA says this doesn't mean it has to give away flights and that it's simply about increasing frequency.
Well, if they think they're going to be able to keep their regulars away from budget airlines once they enter the picture, they're dead wrong.
Regulars were only regulars because they didn't have much of a choice.
I'd rather be loyal to my pocket, and go for something cheaper, even if it means the flight attendant doesn't offer me anything to drink for 30 minutes.
Serene Lim
ArchivesBut things are finally happening on that front.
It's been two years since Malaysia and Singapore started entertaining the idea of revising their 34-year-old bilateral air service agreement.
This means the countries' national carriers – Malaysia Airlines and Singapore Airlines – would lose their duopoly.
Malaysia set up a committee last month to decide on the feasibility of such an agreement ahead of ASEAN's Open Sky Agreement, which states that airlines of member countries can operate unlimited flights between their capital cities by 2008.
While air agreements do not require the consent of national carriers, they are usually consulted before deals are sealed.
But if the national airlines have a lot of clout, their interests are sometimes put before the countries'.
Channel NewsAsia quoted Malaysian Transport Minister Chan Kong Choy as saying, “We believe the further liberalisation of aviation links actually benefits the two countries in tourism, trade and investment. Whether you like it or not, according to this ASEAN aviation roadmap, we are going to open up.”
So let's get down to business. Is this going to hurt SIA or not?
Personally, I think it is going to hurt MAS more than SIA because it will be difficult to turn around RM1.3 bln of losses reported last year without this profitable route.
Given the 30minute flight time and lack of service, paying S$425 for a round trip ticket is pretty extortionate.
It's no wonder AirAsia head Tony Fernandes wants a piece of the pie, and so does Tiger Airways.
This is the most expensive sector to fly in the world and together the airlines operate more than 200 flights a week!
SIA says this doesn't mean it has to give away flights and that it's simply about increasing frequency.
Well, if they think they're going to be able to keep their regulars away from budget airlines once they enter the picture, they're dead wrong.
Regulars were only regulars because they didn't have much of a choice.
I'd rather be loyal to my pocket, and go for something cheaper, even if it means the flight attendant doesn't offer me anything to drink for 30 minutes.
Serene Lim
January 2006 February 2006 March 2006 April 2006 May 2006 June 2006 July 2006 August 2006 September 2006 October 2006 November 2006 December 2006 January 2007 February 2007 March 2007 April 2007 May 2007 June 2007 July 2007 August 2007 September 2007 October 2007 November 2007 December 2007 January 2008 February 2008 March 2008 April 2008 May 2008 August 2008 September 2008 October 2008 November 2008 January 2009